Author Topic: The X-Position Thread  (Read 67108 times)

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2728


Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2728
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #137 on: August 19, 2015, 12:50:00 PM »

Online Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13617
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #138 on: August 19, 2015, 03:46:41 PM »
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/x-position-hopeless-builds-house-of-m-hits-the-road-with-all-new-x-men 
its Hopeless lol...see....see what i did there...ill get my coat

LMAO - I almost didn't reply but felt compelled. 

And the added info as always:
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/brettwhite
Email:
[email protected]  Subject line X-Position

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2728
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #139 on: August 25, 2015, 04:21:56 PM »
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/x-position-bunn-teases-romance-and-violence-in-uncanny-x-men Bunn Bunn

so with X-Men Apocalypse coming out maybe thats a reason to have Mystique , Magneto, Psylock and Arcangel on the same team , also there are two more members to come im thinking, Jubs and either Havok or Storm, its going to be a very big team
« Last Edit: August 25, 2015, 04:27:09 PM by Dantay »


Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4274
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #141 on: September 01, 2015, 05:28:41 PM »
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/x-position-nicieza-body-slides-from-age-of-apocalypse-to-deadpool-cable

X-POSITION: NICIEZA BODY-SLIDES FROM "AGE OF APOCALYPSE" TO "DEADPOOL & CABLE"

With the SW "AoA," I kind of liked the Gambit retcon -- though I was sad he was dead, I found Rogue missing him quite touching. What was the thought behind this change in the world's lore? Was it to create a fresh tone in this world? Also, what changes did it allow you to make to the characters that interacted with him?

I knew there was absolutely no way I'd be able to fit all the characters from the gajillion issues that was the original "AoA" into a 5-part story, so I had to either ignore or cull (or both). I chose to kill Gambit because the entire side story of "Gambit & the X-Ternals" from the original story was made moot by the Battleworld status quo. So… having him be dead at the time of this story makes for a lonelier, more isolated Rogue, which played better for the "cornered rats" approach to the surviving X-Men.
I also did not want Rogue to be married to Magneto in this new story, since I always hated that with a capital HATED THAT in the original. I disliked the entire Magneto/Rogue "relationship" as an original reader, much less a writer, so in the new "AoA," I got to create more logical pairings for each of them.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2015, 05:34:20 PM by purplevit »

Offline X-fan73

  • X-Man Teacher
  • *
  • Posts: 446
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #142 on: September 01, 2015, 09:06:43 PM »
My opinion of Nicieza is even higher than it was before I read this! Lol. Still an alive Gambit is always more useful to a comic book than a dead one!

Offline AeroSennin

  • Thief
  • *
  • Posts: 73
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #143 on: September 01, 2015, 10:01:45 PM »
I concur a living Gambit is preferable... but I love him for sparing us a third installment of Rogneto ... it gives me the creeps...

Offline anya

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1360
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #144 on: September 02, 2015, 12:11:43 AM »
 ;) yes, it would have been nice to have aoa gambit back (but I guess the whole battle world thing did make his mission impossible (rimshot  :D ) but major kudos to him for being practically the only male writers at marvel to realize middle aged men marrying their foster daughters is creepy ( that is a very sad fact...)

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2728
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #145 on: September 09, 2015, 03:04:07 AM »
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/x-position-seeley-spurs-an-odd-couple-into-action-in-deadpool-vs-thanos

man thes x-positions are getting worse each mini is getting one , next week its Chris Burnham, Dennis Culver and Ramon Villalobos the E is for Extinction team

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2728

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2728
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #147 on: September 23, 2015, 02:23:20 AM »
http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/x-position-guggenheim-puts-overlooked-mutants-on-x-tinction-agendas-frontlines
the Guggenheim, funny question on if Havok has failed this city i lol'ed . Next week is the X-Editors so get those Gambit Questions in

Online Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13617
Re: The X-Position Thread
« Reply #148 on: September 23, 2015, 10:34:44 AM »
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/brettwhite
Email:
[email protected]  Subject line X-Position

I'll post the thread once its created over at CBR.

Online Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13617
X-Editors X-Po 9/29
« Reply #149 on: September 29, 2015, 05:44:09 PM »
X-Po with the editors.

Not very many books in the Xline and sadly Gambit's only book is Xmen '92

http://www.comicbookresources.com/article/x-position-x-editors-bring-the-x-men-into-all-new-all-different-marvel

Quote
Ketchum: Well, our current line-up of X-Titles is "Extraordinary [X-Men]," "All-New [X-Men]," "Uncanny [X-Men]," "Old Man Logan," "All-New Wolverine" and "[X-Men] '92." (I feel like I'm forgetting one... ?) I promise they are indeed wildly different from one another! No immediate plans to add more X to the plate at the moment, but that's not to say there won't be more titles involving X-characters...