You said the following,
I'm glad Nightcrawler asked Jean about what she did but her explanation didn't really validate what she did. She did something wrong to prevent something worse.
That is your opinion on it not Taylor's and it is that opinion I don't agree with. I was fine with NC bringing it up and I was fine with Jean's response for the reasons I stated.
As for Trinary, you said you can't buy her as a protagonist because she is a cyber terrorist. My point is that really can't solely be it because you clearly enjoy the X-men and Gambit as protagonists despite them being thieves, criminals, murderers and terrorists. The point isn't that you approve of their actions. The point is you still read and enjoyed stories where these things occurred.
No one said the age of Kitty and the O5 make it any better. My point is you still read the comics did you not? So again why all of a sudden is it an issue? It is not a question of whether you agree with child soldiers. It is more so, it never stopped you from reading the comics before. I don't agree with child soldiers either but I still read the X-men who employ child soldiers all the time because I accept a bit of suspension of disbelief. Unless their use of child soldiers is so off putting like when they used a mentally unstable Idie.
I never claimed you defended Lavish. Further I never defended Tchalla and Namor. In fact, I specifically said I agreed with you. I simply pointed out that despite agreeing with you, it doesn't bother me that much just like I know you enjoyed the mini despite the incredibly contrived villain Lavish. The point was not to say you defended Lavish or to disagree with you. The point was to say how big of a deal these contrived things are to us is entirely down to other factors than the fact it is contrived. In short, I would argue terrorism, criminal activity, child soldiers, and plot contrivances are a core feature of the X-men books. So those can't really be reasons you aren't feeling Taylor. For example, my not liking Lavish is not because I abhor all plot contrivances. It is because it was done specifically for the benefit of she who shall not be named and rendered Gambit the third wheel in his own supposed relationship. If not for that, I would have dismissed this plot contrivance like I dismiss many others.