Topic: Gambit 2024

[andresa]

Being handsome is a requirement, but it shouldn't be the only one. Personally, and I know this is a very personal unpopular take, I am ok with suspend my disbelief if the actor is just ok looking but nails the character and mannerisms and convinces me about the role.

Suggesting good-looking actors is not the same as only considering looks. Having the right look is just as important as acting abilities because Gambit is very handsome. I'm definitely NOT ok with that, it'd be a total turn off. If the actor is just ok looking, then it isn't Gambit.

Another actor, btw, that also kinda convinces me could do well is Chase Stokes. I don't consider him being stunningly handsome, but he could do well.

LOL Jesus Christ no.

[Sparta]

The images used here make the whole thing hilarious.



The year of Gambit keeps on giving.

"No, we're not wearing the costumes again, Chan, I'm out, bye. Byeeeee"

The style goes well with some characters. Gambit's face is too rough for this. I take it as YOUNG PEOPLE™ today ain't familiar with the concept of "rough handsome".

Hmm, y'know if I had to ship Gambit with a DC character, it's Catwoman hands down.

[Varia]

Suggesting good-looking actors is not the same as only considering looks. Having the right look is just as important as acting abilities because Gambit is very handsome. I'm definitely NOT ok with that, it'd be a total turn off. If the actor is just ok looking, then it isn't Gambit.

Yeah, it's striking that balance that makes casting Gambit, along with a lot of the other characters, so difficult.


A lot of actors have the face but if they are bad in the role then what's really the point? By the same token I'd say that looks don't matter as long as the role is nailed but I think that appearance can be part of the essence of a character.


I don't think there's ever going to be a consensus on whose hot enough or not, though, bc at the end of the day that's pretty subjective and everyone has their own image of what the character should or shouldn't look like.

[andresa]

A lot of actors have the face but if they are bad in the role then what's really the point? By the same token I'd say that looks don't matter as long as the role is nailed but I think that appearance can be part of the essence of a character.

The other way around is also true. What's the point of having an actor who understands how the character should be but doesn't look the part? Gambit's looks are intrinsic to his character. I really don't get it thinking an under average looking dude could play Gambit is fine coming from his fans.

I don't think there's ever going to be a consensus on whose hot enough or not, though, bc at the end of the day that's pretty subjective and everyone has their own image of what the character should or shouldn't look like.

That's why current standard good-looking is the way to go. Likely what Marvel will go for.

[Varia]

The other way around is also true. What's the point of having an actor who understands how the character should be but doesn't look the part? Gambit's looks are intrinsic to his character. I really don't get it thinking an under average looking dude could play Gambit is fine coming from his fans.

Yeah, I was saying that looks can be an important part of the character in the second sentence, but I can see how it was written in a confusing way. Sorry for that!


For me, personally, someone who reasonably looks like the character is fine, even if I don't personally find them attractive. At the end of the day someone can be attractive but not fit my image of Gambit. I doubt anybody is going to look like the image in my head and I don't think anyone should necessarily be held to that standard.


I wasn't a fan of Channing's casting even when the idea was shopped around years ago. My personal image of Gambit is that he's got a leaner muscular frame than the beefiness Channing has. I don't mean weak or effeminate. Just leaner (and still rugged). For me, it makes sense with his agility and job as a thief. At the same time, with so many different artists' interpretations over the years other peoples' ideas and preferences are going to be different from mine; for many it was perfect casting. Channing, to me, at least does recall to mind artwork done of him, and his enthusiasm for the character was preferable, for me, to someone who just showed up on set and read some lines to collect a paycheck.

[DanndyB]

Of course, we won't have unanimity on who would be the ideal actor or good options, but I believe that appearance is an important part of the character's characterization; after all, he isn't LeBeau for nothing, right?
Certainly, the script is the most important aspect, and it is essential to have a Gambit that aligns with his personality and abilities, which made us love the character. However, his appearance is also part of that. I think this kind of choice reflects respect for the character and how he was created to be.
We are lacking in this regard, considering what we've received over the years, and I don't think we should have to choose (not that we really have a choice, since we aren't the producers) between getting just the script right or just the appearance. As fans, we want the complete package!

[Varia]

We are lacking in this regard, considering what we've received over the years, and I don't think we should have to choose (not that we really have a choice, since we aren't the producers) between getting just the script right or just the appearance. As fans, we want the complete package!

Definitely think everyone can agree on that!

[andresa]

Yeah, I was saying that looks can be an important part of the character in the second sentence, but I can see how it was written in a confusing way. Sorry for that!


For me, personally, someone who reasonably looks like the character is fine, even if I don't personally find them attractive. At the end of the day someone can be attractive but not fit my image of Gambit. I doubt anybody is going to look like the image in my head and I don't think anyone should necessarily be held to that standard.


I wasn't a fan of Channing's casting even when the idea was shopped around years ago. My personal image of Gambit is that he's got a leaner muscular frame than the beefiness Channing has. I don't mean weak or effeminate. Just leaner (and still rugged). For me, it makes sense with his agility and job as a thief. At the same time, with so many different artists' interpretations over the years other peoples' ideas and preferences are going to be different from mine; for many it was perfect casting. Channing, to me, at least does recall to mind artwork done of him, and his enthusiasm for the character was preferable, for me, to someone who just showed up on set and read some lines to collect a paycheck.

Not at all. I was going to reply and then I saw you've added something then I was confused. My fault.


Yeah, no Gambit is as hot as the Gambit in my mind. That's why I'd prefer an actor who fits current beauty standard. It's easier to accept than someone whose attractiveness might be divisive.

[Varia]

Not at all. I was going to reply and then I saw you've added something then I was confused. My fault.

Yeah, I do that a lot  . I always think of a way I could've said something better or something else I want to add for clarification afterwards. It's a habit I'm trying to kick.

[wantutosigh]

The whole "it has to be a "hot" actor" stuff to me reeks of fan-girl stuff. As long as the actor looks decent enough for me to buy him as Gambit, I'm  fine with it. Girls often completely disagree on who is "hot" anyway. I'm more concerned with the writing being good enough for Gambit and the actor having the charisma to pull it off. As well as the physical presence to pull of Gambit's combat abilities and style. If those things are in place then I think most will find him attractive. He's an attractive character. Get him right and the audiences will dig him.

[andresa]

Gambit fans complain about every little detail possible, but suddenly having an average looking dude play him is fine for some reason. It’s seriously laughable. It isn’t about being hot, it’s about looking the part, which is just as important as the rest. Or maybe I’m being a fan in the wrong way and should settle for anyone.

[Toadman005]

Hmm, y'know if I had to ship Gambit with a DC character, it's Catwoman hands down.

Right!??!?


I once caught a lot of heat here thinking the same thing.

[NElizaV]

Right!??!?


I once caught a lot of heat here thinking the same thing.

Gambit goes well with Femme Fatale type of gals. Selina, Bella, Felicia too. Even Joelle was a bit interesting pairing. For flirty criminal missions and occasional hookups at least.

[Toadman005]

Gambit goes well with Femme Fatale type of gals. Selina, Bella, Felicia too. Even Joelle was a bit interesting pairing. For flirty criminal missions and occasional hookups at least.

Oh guarantee they'd have sexual chemistry.

[Nekobaghira]

Gambit goes well with Femme Fatale type of gals. Selina, Bella, Felicia too. Even Joelle was a bit interesting pairing. For flirty criminal missions and occasional hookups at least.

I love all of these pairings. Interesing in character, I know, not popular in view but ... I think it works with Gambit so well.

Oh guarantee they'd have sexual chemistry.

Agreed. Patsy Walker (Hellcat) was hilarious with her trolling him for a date. Fun one shot.

Hmm, y'know if I had to ship Gambit with a DC character, it's Catwoman hands down.

Always liked that ship.

Polaris is my other favorite.