Author Topic: Gambit Watch  (Read 997591 times)

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1065 on: May 18, 2017, 08:51:19 PM »
sigh.... :headcrash: ....hes the king of thieves people, not a whore

He can be the king of thieves and bang whoever the hell he wants.
Who Dat

Offline Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13494
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1066 on: May 18, 2017, 08:56:01 PM »
He can be the king of thieves and bang whoever the hell he wants.

Agreed! LOL

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4218
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1067 on: May 19, 2017, 05:52:42 AM »
Marvel is asking you what X-title you want next and who should be in it.
https://twitter.com/Marvel/status/865243087794294784

It is time to start Gambit solo campaign!

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1068 on: May 19, 2017, 09:26:49 AM »
If Marvel really wants ResurrXion to feel like a return to classic 90's X-Men stuff, a Gambit solo is the next move.
Who Dat

Offline DonPriceTag

  • @theprattlp
  • Global Moderator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
  • Heavens to Murgatroyd!
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1069 on: May 19, 2017, 02:43:00 PM »
If Marvel really wants ResurrXion to feel like a return to classic 90's X-Men stuff, a Gambit solo is the next move.


Lol if nothing​ else, there were a lot of Gambit solos and partner books.
Rogue being flung vagina-first at the first male that pops up on her radar isn't how I'd define "romance," but Marvel must be using a different dictionary than me.- NicoPony

Offline Homme

  • Survivor
  • *
  • Posts: 606
  • I would trade my eyes to see.
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1070 on: May 19, 2017, 02:45:21 PM »
Marvel is asking you what X-title you want next and who should be in it.
https://twitter.com/Marvel/status/865243087794294784

It is time to start Gambit solo campaign!

Only if the concept is a complete ripoff of Persona 5. Gambit becomes a phantom thief who steals from terrible people to expose their secrets and try to force a societal reform. And he has to start dating a complete, shameless expy of Makoto Niijima.

Offline Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13494
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1071 on: May 19, 2017, 04:33:38 PM »
Marvel is asking you what X-title you want next and who should be in it.
https://twitter.com/Marvel/status/865243087794294784

It is time to start Gambit solo campaign!
Thanks Purplevit.  Yes, gang ... tweet them if you got an account. Tell them you want Gambit. :)

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4218
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1072 on: May 22, 2017, 03:48:03 PM »
Gambit and Fanto sketch for Astonishing #1

?hl=ru

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2727
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1073 on: May 22, 2017, 03:49:42 PM »
not bad he doesnt look like the cover so thats good

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4218
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1074 on: May 22, 2017, 03:52:25 PM »
Hastag for pic

#bestbuds

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1075 on: May 22, 2017, 04:02:46 PM »
He does look MUCH better there than on the cover
Who Dat

Offline Spoonz

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1784
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1076 on: May 22, 2017, 05:38:15 PM »
They must really be ignoring continuity if these two are best buds.

Offline Miss Misery

  • X-Man Teacher
  • *
  • Posts: 428
  • "Stay conscious and true to yourself."
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1077 on: May 23, 2017, 09:58:22 AM »
They must really be ignoring continuity if these two are best buds.

That was my thought too.
“Sometimes I feel like you’re the only one who gets me, 1400-pound block of cheese.”—Gareth Reynolds

Offline DonPriceTag

  • @theprattlp
  • Global Moderator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
  • Heavens to Murgatroyd!
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1078 on: May 23, 2017, 01:21:56 PM »
Hmm... I spoke on this over on CBR, but some of us were onboard this "story over continuity" ship because I guess they figured the writers would use it in the way they hoped, not realizing that they may do things like possibly make Gambit and Fantomex buddies (presumably, we don't know if that's going to happen yet), or as we've seen, Gambit a bumbling attempted hero, screwing up the one thing he's supposed to be famous for, doing something he actually shouldn't be doing given his current status, but I can and have said the same about his last 4 guest appearances. The only one that kind of made sense was his Civil War II stint in which he gets knocked out by his ex-girlfriend's mother, via sucker punch. These are comics and at the end of the day, letting a writer pick and choose what they want to ignore or embrace is bad practice, especially because Marvel editorial is so weak these days. Nothing, even amongst "top tier" characters, is consistent, what makes anyone think that that approach would fair well for a character coming out of forced obscurity? I say 'forced' because Gambit had no reason to disappear. He's a got a strong fan following among hardcore readers and nonreaders alike.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2017, 03:36:24 PM by DonPriceTag »
Rogue being flung vagina-first at the first male that pops up on her radar isn't how I'd define "romance," but Marvel must be using a different dictionary than me.- NicoPony

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4218
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #1079 on: May 27, 2017, 07:23:25 AM »
Inked version of Gambit and Fanto sketch for Astonishing