Author Topic: Gambit Watch  (Read 1002610 times)

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2727
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #705 on: February 15, 2017, 12:46:35 PM »
i can never post pics i have to take them on my phone, i had a few of my collection i wanted to post at christmas when i was home, i have the tpb Gambit & the Externals with the gold cove i wanted to show ye but the file is too big for here, even a single photo :(

Offline Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13535
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #706 on: February 15, 2017, 01:36:40 PM »
I won't get to my LCS until later this week... if it's not up by then, I'll post a scan

Awesome ... thanking you in advance.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2017, 03:38:35 PM by Nekobaghira »

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2727
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #707 on: February 15, 2017, 02:48:59 PM »
HOLY s*** CBR just acknowledged Gamit was once a leader of the X-Men...in a list...of Underrated X-Men Leaders......Gambit.......Underrated .....Leader...cbr, its cannon :o

http://www.cbr.com/the-16-most-underrated-x-leaders/

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #708 on: February 19, 2017, 09:32:39 AM »
Are we on a silent strike here? What's going on?? lol kidding kidding.

James Mangold expressed interest to possibly continue with X-23 in the movies... possibly her own stand alone. How would you guys feel about Gambit possibly being introduced in THAT movie? If it were to come to fruition. If his own movie continues to be stuck in the mud at least.
Who Dat

Offline Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13535
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #709 on: February 19, 2017, 11:43:45 AM »
Yeah, we have been quiet. LOL

I don't know ... I guess it would be okay if Gambit was introduced via X-23 ... but tbh - the thought of her getting a film doesn't appeal to me. It's all riding on the film Logan ... and that Hugh Jackman is done with Wolverine. There is no replacement for him ... so X-23 is an attempt to keep that "type" of character going without him.

Angry girl movies ... yay ... <sarcasm

« Last Edit: February 19, 2017, 12:34:30 PM by Nekobaghira »

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #710 on: February 19, 2017, 12:46:04 PM »
I want Gambit to be introduced in Gambit movie. Won't be too excited to see his first appearence in X-23.

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #711 on: February 19, 2017, 01:12:10 PM »
I want Gambit to be introduced in Gambit movie. Won't be too excited to see his first appearence in X-23.

But what if that doesn't happen? Would you rather never see him in the movies at all? It would make me want to see an X-23 movie even more if he was in it.
Who Dat

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #712 on: February 19, 2017, 01:31:21 PM »
I like Liu's Gambit but it is not that Gambit that I want to see as introduced Gambit. It is good as character progression.

If too choose X-23 solo or nothing then ofcourse x-23.
But I still thibk that we will see Gambit movie.

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #713 on: February 19, 2017, 01:33:46 PM »
I think we'll see one too, but if it's having a hard time getting off the ground now, I don't see why introducing him in another movie would be a bad thing. If anything people will be more excited to see said movie if Gambit's there. Aside from Wolverine, Gambit is one of the most well-recognizable X-Men by the general public.
Who Dat

Offline purplevit

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #714 on: February 19, 2017, 01:42:53 PM »
They decided to introduce him in solo because Tatum wanted to explain who Gambit is at first. And wanted to do it in solo.

I am 100 percent sure Gambit originally were supposed to appear as horseman in Apocalypse and later they changed him to Psylocke.
And I am glad with that. I really don't like Apocalypse and I doubt that in it Singer could do justice for Gambit or even his skills.

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #715 on: February 19, 2017, 02:17:06 PM »
They decided to introduce him in solo because Tatum wanted to explain who Gambit is at first. And wanted to do it in solo.

That's not how it worked in the books... and it may be better off that way. It's okay for Gambit to mysteriously appear in another movie first before we all learn about him.
Who Dat

Offline Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13535
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #716 on: February 19, 2017, 03:51:13 PM »
Technically, Gambit has already been introduced.   :P

Offline cc008

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 1216
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #717 on: February 19, 2017, 04:53:41 PM »
Technically, Gambit has already been introduced.   :P

As was Deadpool! lol. Neither in their own movie.

Funny enough, I thought "Wade Wilson" and "Remy/Gambit" were two of the more enjoyable parts of that disasterpiece.
Who Dat

Offline Nekobaghira

  • Administrator
  • X-Man Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 13535
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #718 on: February 19, 2017, 05:28:19 PM »
As was Deadpool! lol. Neither in their own movie.

Funny enough, I thought "Wade Wilson" and "Remy/Gambit" were two of the more enjoyable parts of that disasterpiece.

Agreed ... their time in the movie helped it ... because some of it was awful.

Offline Dantay

  • X-Man Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 2727
Re: Gambit Watch
« Reply #719 on: February 19, 2017, 06:07:35 PM »
at this rate Gambit will be in the next X-Men movie hopefully